Sign Up For Our Newsletter

When four education professors author a report about a change in public education governance that actually turns the incentives and power structure from top down control to bottom up accountability, it’s unlikely to result in anything but misrepresentations and confusion. That’s precisely what occurred in the report covered by Business Insider on January 6, one that attempts to discredit the movement that Time Magazine once called a grassroots revolution by comparing it to the mortgage crisis. The authors believe and say as much in their report that parents of students in charter schools – some 2.5 million of them – actually don’t freely make choices. These “we know best” academics infer that poor people, in particular, are not capable of doing so given their poverty or low income status (Note: 60% of all charters have a mean of 60% or more children of color and as many have a mean of more than 60% at risk, but they are not all poor, minority schools.) They clearly have never met a charter parent – or perhaps any low income parent – who despite their challenges know their children better than anyone else about what works for their child’s education.

The education academics’ inference -wrongly – is that we charter schools give a choice to people who are not qualified, much in the same way that the sub-prime housing bust was a result of giving mortgages to people who could not afford to put money down, on houses whose values were inflated. In that case, if housing prices went up, the buyer would win. If not, the taxpayer would lose – and lose they did.

In charter schools, parents make a decision to take their child from, or not enroll them, in the assigned public school. They are in the same financial position as every other parent who the government supports by funding specific traditional public school systems. If they make a choice because they believe it will be better, and they are right, their kids succeed. If they are wrong, they have the right to transfer back. The taxpayer does not lose. In fact, the taxpayer gains because the 90% of charters opened that succeed by all measure help fuel better education, better jobs and thus a better economy.

After almost 25 years of charter schooling in this nation, a movement involving some 6,800 schools, serving 2.5 million students and involving more than 4 million adults, one would think that even marginal education professors might take the time to learn first hand and read the hundreds of studies done which validate that these schools have succeeded in not only stabilizing public education but saving it from further failure.

-Jeanne Allen, Founder and President Emeritus of The Center for Education Reform