Sign up for our newsletter

CER Responds to an Attack on the Nation’s Charter Schools

In August of 2004 Diana Jean Schemo and the New York Times published “Nation’s Charter Schools Lagging Behind, U.S. Test Scores Reveal.” The piece alleged charters performed poorer than traditional public schools in almost all cases, citing findings from the 2003 National Assessment of Educational Progress that were “unearthed from online data by researchers at the American Federation of Teachers” and sent by researchers from the teachers union to the Times. Schemo credited the AFT as historically supporting the idea of charter schools, contrary to previously published studies by the union that would beg to differ. The paper implied that there were efforts made to keep the findings out of the public eye, too. 

The Center for Education Reform responded not days later, and with the signatures and support of 30 prominent members of the national research community took out a full page ad in the Times condemning the report and the study as failing to meet professional research standards. CER later published a release demonstrating the volume and content of the coverage the AFT report and Times’ article was receiving across the country. The magazine Education Week found fault with the AFT study and the New York Times coverage as well. CER Founder Jeanne Allen appeared on the Tavis Smiley radio show with then-AFT head Bella Rosenberg to discuss the data.

A Leader’s Choice

“It’s not an experiment anymore. It’s not a demonstration. It’s not a what-if. After 20 years, we have overwhelming evidence . . . of kids, parents, families who have found what they were looking for in the charter school movement here in the Commonwealth of Mass.”

Those are words from Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker as he addressed the crowd of parents, educators and advocates at the State House last week as they prepared to press lawmakers to lift the cap on charter schools.

Since October 2015, the Governor has been pushing legislation that would allow 12 new or expanded charter schools statewide annually in low-performing districts.

While eliminating caps completely and allowing for independent authorizers could really help charter schools grow and thrive in the Bay State, the expansion would without a doubt be a positive step forward, as the state has nearly the s37000kidsMAchartersame number of children on charter school wait lists (about 37,000) as they do enrolled in public charter schools (approximately 40,000). Compared to traditional district schools, public charter school students in Massachusetts score proficient or advanced in all subject tests at every grade level. In fact, some of the state’s urban charter schools with populations that are mostly low-income and minority students are ranked among some of the best schools in the state.

“Governor Baker is putting a lot of political capital on the line for school choice for some of the poorest students in the state,” Mary Kissel of the Wall Street Journal notes. Despite the fact that charter schools have disrupted traditional public education in positive ways, there’s still reluctance and backlash to expand choices because of pushback from groups like the teacher’s union interested in maintaining the status quo.

From the cap push in Massachusetts, to Tennessee where progress toward full vouchers for the most needy is finally on a positive path and holds hope for that governor’s initial promises, it’s important to not just know, but highlight how state chief executives are doing in ensuring innovation thrives in our schools.

Today, we celebrate Gov. Baker’s commitment to children, and all elected officials across the nation taking their responsibility seriously to create more and better learning opportunities for children by championing school choice.

This is one of a series of posts highlighting numerous diverse opportunities from towns to nations for National School Choice Week 2016.

Newswire: January 26, 2016

Vol. 18, No. 4

In lieu of this week’s Newswire, we’re bringing you today’s School Choice Week spotlight on the leaders who help push for the conditions possible to make numerous and diverse education options a reality for children.

A Leader’s Choice

“It’s not an experiment anymore. It’s not a demonstration. It’s not a what-if. After 20 years, we have overwhelming evidence . . . of kids, parents, families who have found what they were looking for in the charter school movement here in the Commonwealth of Mass.”

Those are words from Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker as he addressed the crowd of parents, educators and advocates at the State House last week as they prepared to press lawmakers to lift the cap on charter schools.

Since October 2015, the Governor has been pushing legislation that would allow 12 new or expanded charter schools statewide annually in low-performing districts.

Gov Charlie Baker and charter school advocates gather to encourage lawmakers to lift the cap on charter schools

Photo Courtesy of Masslive.com

While eliminating caps completely and allowing for independent authorizers could really help charter schools grow and thrive in the Bay State, the expansion would without a doubt be a positive step forward, as the state has nearly the same number of children on charter school wait lists (about 37,000) as they do enrolled in public charter schools (approximately 40,000). Compared to traditional district schools, public charter school students in Massachusetts score proficient or advanced in all subject tests at every grade level. In fact, some of the state’s urban charter schools with populations that are mostly low-income and minority students are ranked among some of the best schools in the state.

“Governor Baker is putting a lot of political capital on the line for school choice for some of the poorest students in the state,” Mary Kissel of the Wall Street Journal notes. Despite the fact that charter schools have disrupted traditional public education in positive ways, there’s still reluctance and backlash to expand choices because of pushback from groups like the teacher’s union interested in maintaining the status quo.

From the cap push in Massachusetts, to Tennessee where progress toward full vouchers for the most needy is finally on a positive path and holds hope for that governor’s initial promises, it’s important to not just know, but highlight how state chief executives are doing in ensuring innovation thrives in our schools.

Today, we celebrate Gov. Baker’s commitment to children, and all elected officials across the nation taking their responsibility seriously to create more and better learning opportunities for children by championing school choice.

This is one of a series of posts highlighting numerous diverse opportunities from towns to nations for National School Choice Week 2016.

 

State of the States: How Do Our Governors Stack Up on Education?

Governors all over the country are in the midst of delivering their State of the State addresses, laying out their reflections on the last year and where they plan to go this year. What better time than during National School Choice Week for reformers to compare and challenge – what’s your chief executive’s record compared to when he or she ran for office and what have they done?

CER’s Educationfifty.com offers analysis on where governors stand on three core edreform tenets: 1) strong charter school laws, 2) meaningful school choice, and 3) strong teacher quality efforts, providing information to help you gauge whether they are acting on their original commitments, today.

From Boston, Mass. where there is a major cap lift going on and a governor that’s been true to his promises, to Tennessee where progress toward full vouchers for the most needy is finally on a positive path and holds hope for that governor’s initial promises, it’s important to not just know but highlight how state chief executives are doing in ensuring innovation thrives in our schools.

With states our laboratories for change, it’s a critical time just one month into the new year to take stock.

Here’s a list of State of the State addresses that have already occurred, and whether or not education reform was addressed (Click on a state’s name to be taken to full Education50 analysis):

Alaska
Gov. Walker’s State of the State address touched on the need to ensure high-quality educators for Alaska’s children.

Arizona
Gov. Ducey, in his State of the State address, discussed philanthropic foundations that are investing into the state education system and his intent to partner with them to expand opportunities for low-income children (and to further arts and sciences programs).

California
Gov. Brown’s State of the State address did not address education reform.

Colorado
Gov. Hickenlooper’s State of the State address did not address education reform.

Florida
Gov. Scott’s State of the State address did not address education reform.

Georgia
Gov. Nathan Deal touched on teacher quality reform in his State of the State e address, stating that he created a Teacher Advisory Committee by executive order to help retain lead teachers, increase assistant teacher salaries and maintain classroom quality. He also mentioned that this year’s budget would include funding for the Education Reform Commission, tasked with examining Georgia’s education system and reporting “bold” recommendations on how to improve it, but he did not go into specifics.

Hawaii
Gov. Ige’s State of the State address did not address education reform.

Idaho
Gov. Otter mentioned teacher quality reform in his State of the State address, discussing the need to invest in the professional development of teachers in order to successfully retain them. He called for more than $38 million to continue putting the teacher career ladder in place.

Indiana
In the State of the State address, Gov. Pence noted that the state now has one of the largest school voucher programs in the country. He also stated that Indiana has become the first state in the U.S. to make vocational and career education a priority in high schools.

Iowa
Gov. Branstad’s State of the State address noted increased funding for teacher leadership.

Kansas
Gov. Brownback’s State of the State address discussed the necessity of quality teachers and how they build the education system. He addressed implementing innovative options like merit pay in order to reward exceptional teachers.

Massachusetts
Gov. Baker discussed his support for expanding the availability of public charter schools across the state in his State of the State address. He mentioned lifting the cap that the state holds on charter schools because, “These are families that can’t afford to move, and they can’t afford to send their kids to private schools. This is their chance – and it’s a good one.”

Michigan
Gov. Snyder, in his State of the State address, mentioned that he would like to see an educational system where parents, students and teachers look to a more proactive approach.

Missouri
Gov. Nixon’s State of the State address did not address education reform.

Nebraska
Gov. Ricketts’ State of the State address did not address education reform.

New Jersey
Gov. Christie’s State of the State address did not address education reform.

New Mexico
Gov. Martinez’s State of the State address discussed the need for a quality teacher in every classroom.

New York
Gov. Cuomo stated in his State of the State address that charter schools are public schools and “education laboratories”, and he is proud that they serve some of the neediest students, nearly 100,000 across the state. He said charters are an important option for communities with failing schools, and an economical option, and he encourages their development in this budget.

South Carolina
Gov. Haley, in her State of the State address, noted that she wants to end the high turnover of teachers in rural and poor districts. She proposed paying for state college tuition of teachers who would agree to spend eight years teaching in a rural or poor district.

South Dakota
Gov. Daugaard addressed the need to retain and recruit high-quality teachers saying, “the key to student achievement is an effective teacher,” in his State of the State address.

Vermont
Gov. Shumlin’s State of the State address did not address education reform.

Virginia
Governor McAuliffe’s State of the State address did not address education reform.

Washington
Gov. Inslee’s State of the State address did not address education reform.

West Virginia
Gov. Tomblin noted in his State of the State address that he created the Innovation in Education Grant Program designed to reward teachers and students in West Virginia for innovation and creativity in the classroom.

Visit Educationfifty.com today, and check back often as State of the State addresses continue through February.

 

A Family’s Choice

From the Nevada Public Public Policy Research Institute comes this story of a couple who have made it their mission to help low-income children through education, and whose dreams may be shattered by the anti-reform efforts of unions and other groups to block Nevada Education Savings Accounts (ESAs) in court from becoming reality in the classroom.

Starting as educators in Detroit, DaJuane and Tamara Anderson moved to Las Vegas, Nevada and founded The Anderson Academy of Mathematics and Science, a private school “with the sole purpose” of helping at-risk students succeed with their education.”

Screen Shot 2016-01-22 at 6.04.11 PM

“So many parents in this community have a one-track mind when it comes to private schools,” DaJuane told the Nevada Policy Research Institute. “They think all private schools are expensive, far away or not designed for struggling minority students. We want to tear down that perception.”

Nevada’s new Education Savings Account (ESA) program made the $500-a-month tuition more feasible for low-income families searching for an alternative to their assigned neighborhood school failing to meet their child’s learning needs.

Sadly, Nevada’s program is in legal limbo right now because it is being challenged by a group of parents and the ACLU in two different lawsuits, threatening the potential for more parents to give their own children the dream of a great education, and not just parents who want better education opportunities for their children, but parents who want to CREATE better education opportunities for kids, like The Andersons.

Today we celebrate families helping other families make it possible to make the best possible choice for their children’s education.

This is one of a series of posts highlighting numerous diverse opportunities from towns to nations for National School Choice Week 2016.

Neither Snow, Nor Storm, Nor Dark of Night…

…Can Keep School Choice Week from Taking Flight!

At the heart of any successful education reform effort is freedom – the freedom for students, parents and educators to have new opportunities, and schools to pursue new innovations or ideas.

That’s why we’re thrilled to have a week to share how freedom works when it’s permitted in education. We salute all those engaged in thScreen Shot 2016-01-25 at 8.31.37 AMis, the 6th annual National School Choice Week, and join with the tens of thousands across the country – and globe – in celebrating the power and ever-growing potential of school choice. This year, there are more than 16,000 events planned in the U.S. and beyond, making this week the largest celebration of education choice in history.

Throughout the week, we will share numerous and diverse choice opportunities in education to help you follow the events of the week and share across the net to help raise public awareness for school choice.

And Don’t Forget!

1. Use #SCW to add your voice to the largest ever digital #SchoolChoice event!

2. Find an event near you! Use the school choice week map to locate and attend one of the more than16,000 events planned across all 50 states and Washington, D.C.!

3. Watch & share the official NSCW 2016 kickoff video!

Screen Shot 2016-01-22 at 12.33.46 PM

4.Get educated! Learn facts about school choice and share them with the click of a button.

And let us know if you have questions, suggestions or ideas to share and we will help you get them out there!

National School Choice Week 2016

Our nation’s future depends on great educational opportunities for all children. Every year in January, National School Choice Week celebrates and shines a spotlight on effective education options of all varieties — traditional public schools, public charter schools, online, blended, and virtual schools, homeschooling, and any other type of learning innovation helping children excel.

National School Choice Week 2016 (January 24-30) is already the world’s largest celebration of educational opportunity in history, with more than 16,000 events planned.

To celebrate, CER is highlighting numerous and diverse choice opportunities in education all week — from towns to nations. Check back here daily for updates, starting Monday!

Story #1: A Family’s Choice
Story #2: A Leader’s Choice
Story #3: A School of Choice

Story #4: National Lawmakers Championing Choice
Story #5: Choice Internationally

GET INVOLVED!

 

 

Statement from CER on NAPCS Charter School Law Report

Allen: The Content of Laws Matters In Ensuring Student Success

January 21, 2016

Jeanne Allen, Founder and President Emeritus of The Center for Education Reform (CER), issued the following statement on the release of Measuring Up to the Model: A Ranking of State Charter School Laws yesterday from the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools (NAPCS):

“We applaud Nina and her team at NAPCS for advancing our shared goal of fostering great laws in what is arguably one of the most promising public school reforms of all time –charter schools. As we know, strong charter school laws are vital for a thriving, successful charter school movement, and the more analysis and investigation into their impacts, the better.

“Because CER also has studied and analyzed charter school laws since 1996, it’s important that public policy influencers and lawmakers understand the critical distinctions in these two important, but compatible reports. NAPCS assesses ‘whether and how state laws and regulations address the National Alliance model law,’ except for in a few areas – such as caps, multiple authorizers, and funding – where they deemed it necessary to capture what’s happening in practice in order to ‘fairly capture the strength of the law’.

“CER’s national rankings and scorecard, currently scheduled to be released after most legislative sessions are over this year to guide future discussions, are based not only on the policies imbedded in each law, but how such policies actually effect the proposing, review, development and progress of each potential or existing school itself. Over time we have learned that what matters most in ensuring the healthy creation and growth of exceptional charter school opportunities for families is whether or not the state permits the diversity of founders, boards and authorizers that the authors of the charter schooling first outlined as the way to create diverse choices. The provision of independent structures from which innovation and freedom can best be applied to the educational process is a necessity, and thus laws which only allow existing local and state structures or are connected to districts and state education agencies do not foster the growth of high quality charter schools nearly as much as those which provide for additional authorizers.

“This is why, for example, while Alabama’s newer charter school law earns second place on NAPCS’ rankings, according to CER’s methodology, Alabama’s law will likely earn a mediocre grade this spring.

“In addition to authorizing, CER also ranks whether the state provides for equitable funding – codified in law – and gives charter schools enough autonomy to create and manage their schools, including choosing who they hire, whose programs they use and what, if any, managers they need to support them to do their job. Laws should be firm on the ends and loose on the means, and not prescriptive about how to achieve the goal of the contract for which they are held accountable by law.

“We welcome and encourage the increased debate and dialogue surrounding charter school laws as it raises the level of awareness and activity that should be the focus on our nation’s most important priority – our children and exceptional educational opportunities for all.”

 

Newswire: January 19, 2016

Vol. 18, No. 3

CALL FOR CANDIDATES. We expect our leaders to speak a certain way about what it takes to improve schools. And that’s exactly why we offered guiding principals for presidential candidates, as they debated shortly after President Obama’s final State of the Union speech, centered around the philosophies of those who work on the ground daily to advance innovation, freedom and flexibility in education. While the debates focused on jobs and the economy and foreign policy, candidates could have talked about how all of this ties back to education and creating an innovative and accountable environment so all children have access to excellent schools.

debate

MISSED OPPORTUNITY. Speaking of what could have been discussed by our nation’s future leaders, President Obama’s first visit to Omaha, Nebraska was the perfect opportunity to address an education system that’s failing too many children, particularly children of color. Read why from Educate Nebraska’s Executive Director here.

EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY. Speaking of candidates, as we honored Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s legacy of freedom and equality yesterday, former Florida Governor and presidential contender Jeb Bush, rolled out his education policy plans. “Every individual in this country has the right to rise,” he said. “Yet today, the American Dream — the idea that anything is possible through hard work — is threatened by an education system failing to prepare the next generation of children for success.” For more, go here. CER will be watching for other candidates to release major education platforms centered on parent power and opportunity — or at least we can hope!

STATE OF THE STATES. With governors in the midst of giving their State of the State addresses, how do they stack up on education reform now compared to what they said when they ran? Educationfifty.com is your tool to help hold leaders accountable on their promises.

Screen Shot 2016-01-19 at 2.01.25 PM#RALLYINTALLY. Over 10,000 parents, children, teachers and reform advocates gathered in Tallahassee, FL this morning in support of their state’s tax credit scholarship program, currently helping nearly 80,000 students access an education that better meets their needs but is in the midst of a lawsuit brought on by the status quo. Martin Luther King, III was among those rallying to #DropTheSuit, telling Politico that he believes his father would have supported school choice programs because they lift up and create opportunities for children.

JUDGE JUDY = SUPREME COURT? Nearly 10 percent of recent U.S. college graduates think the famous TV judge is actually a U.S. Supreme Court justice,  according to the report, “A Crisis in Civic Education.”  According to the Nation’s Report Card, not even one third of our nation’s 8th graders are proficient in history and civics, subjects that are vital to our nation’s democracy. If we aren’t careful, we may find ourselves unequipped to govern ourselves let alone provide governance to others we thought in greater need. Which is another reason why we must continue to push for policies that offer flexibility, freedom and innovation in education, and leaders that aren’t afraid to stand up to the status quo.

SCHOOL CHOICE WEEK is happening January 24-30! This 6th annual celebration brings attention to the critical importance of giving parents the opportunity to improve the lives of their children!  Make sure you add your voice to the largest ever #SchoolChoice conversation happening on social media!

New study reveals woeful state of American civic education

by Victor Skinner
January 14, 2016
EAG News

A survey of recent U.S. college graduates shows nearly 10 percent think Judge Judy is on the Supreme Court.

Nearly 60 percent of those surveyed didn’t know how the Constitution is amended, and almost 40 percent didn’t know Congress can declare war. More than 60 percent of those polled also thought Thomas Jefferson – not James Madison – is the “Father of the Constitution,” the American Council of Trustees and Alumni report.

“Many of the figures may actually understate how poorly our colleges are doing because older respondents performed significantly better than younger ones,” according to a report released by the group this week titled “A Crisis in Civic Education.”

Read the rest of the article here. 

 

RELATED:
Nation’s Report Card Indicates Less Than 30 Percent of U.S. Students Proficient In History, Geography, Civics