Sign up for our newsletter

“For Too Many Families, The Skies Have Not Cleared”: Massachusetts’ Time To Shine for Education Opportunity

On Thursday, July 14th, Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker stood in front of the  State House among families, students, legislators, and residents to advocate for the importance of expanding educational opportunities for children.

Students and their families — likely some of the more than 32,000 on charter school wait lists — echoed throughout the downpour of rain as they chanted, “lift the cap!” in support of lifting current limitations — or a “cap” — on charter schools in the Bay State. Currently, there are limits on the number of charter schools allowed to open in Massachusetts, the number of students allowed, and funding limitations.

Recently, Question 2 was added to November’s election ballot as a way to give residents a voice in whether authorizing either the approval of up to twelve new charter schools or the expansion of student enrollment in existing charter schools would provide more opportunities for students to succeed academically.

During the rainy rally, Governor Baker stated that “for too many families and too many kids, the skies have not cleared, the sun has not shined…too many do not get the chance and opportunity to go to the school of their choice and to have the chance to fulfill their dream that most kids and their families do in the Commonwealth.”

As Governor Baker and the families behind him rallied for greater parent power through charter schools, the skies cleared and the sun began to shine possibly signifying that the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is ready for a bright change of opportunities.

Seeking Innovative Solutions to The Challenge of Adult Literacy

By Liza McFadden

My great-grandparents emigrated from Westport, Ireland and I’ve traveled to see the home they left. In the summer it’s a charming, whitewashed building with a picturesque view of the harbor that belies the hunger and hardship that motivated its residents to seek a better life across the ocean.

I’m reminded of this image daily in my work as a literacy advocate. Not too long ago, myself and Doro Bush Koch, Honorary Chair of the Barbara Bush Foundation for Family Literacy, visited families in our Rockville, Maryland program, most of whom had come to America seeking relief from dire poverty in Guatemala. One mother cried when sharing with us that due to funding constraints, she would have to leave the program when her son turned four and went to preschool.

Despite our knowledge that a mother’s educational level is the number one determinant of a child’s likelihood to graduate from high school, we’re going backwards. Enrollment in adult literacy and English Language Learning programs has declined by 27% since 2001. The recession steamrolled dreams: in Los Angeles alone there was a decline of over 800,000 students served from 2008 to 2013, and local adult literacy waiting lists are in the thousands.

I believe in order to address these problems, it is time to consider all options that increase access and opportunity. Why aren’t innovative education reform models found in the K-12 system more prevalent in adult education? I believe we could benefit from studying both successful and emerging implementations of these models. For example:

  • Sonia Gutierrez,who is considered both a Hispanic rights activist and literacy leader, championed the rights of adult literacy students, and in 1998 the Carlos Rosario International Public Charter School was awarded the first adult charter school in Washington, D.C.
  • Briya Public Charter School in Washington, D.C. is the nation’s only family literacy charter school, providing both adult and early childhood education. Briya was established in the late 1980s via federal funding and funding from the Barbara Bush Foundation.
  • Goodwill’s expansion of their charter efforts in Indianapolis, Texas, Tennessee, and D.C., which I am eagerly following.

As Jeanne Allen, Founder and CEO of the Center for Education Reform, shares, there’s a lot we can learn from the K-12 charter school world – which has shaken up the traditional K-12 system by bringing in new partners, methods, and ideas about how to address ALL students’ learning needs. And there are clear lessons learned: if charters don’t set and clearly articulate agreed-upon community goals, they can be closed. As Allen shares in this video clip, she believes that “the power of adult literacy applied to charter schools is really unbridled,” and full of potential to improve the lives of individuals, their families, and their entire communities.

With 36 million low-literate adults in the U.S. — many of them parents like the ones I met in Maryland, whose children depend on them to help lay the educational foundation necessary to break the multi-generational cycle of social and economic disadvantage — we must adopt a fresh perspective on adult literacy. It is imperative that we expand our conversations to include new ideas and innovative partnerships. As Albert Einstein said, “We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.”

Liza McFadden is President and CEO of the Barbara Bush Foundation for Family Literacy.

Unraveling New Orleans’s education reform a lesson for Louisiana

by Jeanne Allen
The Advocate
July 18, 2016

Sometimes it takes a tragedy to remind us what’s important — and what not to take for granted. Nowhere is this more obvious for the education reform movement than in New Orleans.

Before Hurricane Katrina, 62 percent of students in New Orleans were enrolled in failing schools. Half didn’t graduate from high school. Today, three quarters of kids are graduating on time, and the percentage of students testing at grade level has skyrocketed by 77 percent. The difference? More than 90 percent of students are enrolled in charter schools, many of which were created by the state of Louisiana and education reformers to help fill the void left in the wake of Katrina.

For education reformers — the people who dreamed not only of remaking schools, but also reimagining school districts and entire education systems — New Orleans reminds us of what’s possible. Parents, regardless of their means and their ZIP code, finally got to choose what worked best for their children. The fact that schools had autonomy and parents had choices helped make the entire city a hotbed of innovation — from training to technology to curricula.

But now, 20 years after Louisiana’s first charter school opened and nearly 11 years after Katrina, charter schools have shifted into a defensive posture. During his campaign for governor last year, John Bel Edwards promised not to meddle with the Big Easy’s innovators. Now, he works with teachers unions and legislators to limit the very independence and innovation that school choice programs represent. Indeed, in the name of “local control,” the fate of the charter sector was thrown to an institution — the Orleans Parish School Board — which has historically opposed giving any power to schools or autonomy to individuals. This is the same structure, by the way, which doomed New Orleans students to violent and chronically failing schools before Katrina.

This sudden unraveling of the New Orleans revolution signifies one of the most troubling signs of education reform, and its implications go beyond the Big Easy. Louisiana saw a slew of legislation this year aimed at restraining and limiting parent power. Gains achieved in states, cities and towns nationwide are under constant threat from local school boards and politicians. Across the country, attempts to limit law, policy and practice continue to stifle opportunity and the groundbreaking approaches to learning that once were on an exponential growth curve.

It is tempting to attribute this troubling trend line to a natural reaction to education reform’s successes — a sign of growing pains. The enemies of change — most invested in the status quo — are clearly threatened, and they are fighting back with everything they have. Inertia, ignorance about outcomes, and a powerful teachers union are all part of the story not just in Louisiana, but in America.

Unfortunately, reformers have turned a blind eye to innovations and customized solutions. Instead, we’re focused on creating more uniform schools that ensure more predictable outcomes. To minimize alleged risk, we’re now driven to embrace only those new institutions that are created and managed by familiar, “proven” entities. What started out as an agenda that was bold and all-encompassing has morphed into something that too often comes across as narrow, hollow and hostile to the idea and ideals of public education.

Such an approach not only threatens the education reform movement’s very existence, but also ignores the changing character of rank-and-file teachers. A growing number of educators are younger and embrace the fundamentals of reform — flexibility, diversity and innovation.

Parents everywhere want choices. Students need — and deserve — diverse learning approaches. A new generation of educators is restless. Teachers in every kind of school want autonomy.

We need a new way forward — not another round of stubborn retrenchment, but a fresh vision that will make good on our movement’s original promise of turning around America’s failing schools. In an election year that promises to challenge and upset even our best success, we must succeed by having every education policy effort going forward focused on creating the opportunity for innovation.

Jeanne Allen is the founder and CEO of the Center for Education Reform and author of The New Opportunity Agenda.

Coming Soon!

We’re laying out the facts to analyze how party platforms stack up on advancing innovation and opportunity in education.

North Carolina Increases Education Opportunity

July 18, 2016

WASHINGTON, DC — Legislative action in North Carolina will result in new and expanded opportunities for students, thanks to the creation of a new Achievement School District and expanded resources for teachers, students and families.

The state’s 2016-17 FY budget provides for an increase in the statewide opportunity scholarship program, expanding choices for children who need them most. Within a decade, more than 35,000 students will be able to access new scholarships.

The budget also provides for teacher pay increases and allows schools to reduce class size in the early grades.

Recognizing that failing schools can be turned around, State Representative Rob Bryan spearheaded an effort to create the Achievement School District (ASD). The ASD will allow newly constituted schools to take the place of failing neighborhood schools, serving families without the economic means to pick up and move to a school with a better track record.

“This is an encouraging step forward for innovation and opportunity in the Tar Heel state education system, acknowledging that a one-size-fits-all approach simply won’t work for all students,” said Jon Hage, CER Chairman and Founder and CEO Charter Schools USA.

About the Center for Education Reform

Founded in 1993, the Center for Education Reform aims to expand educational opportunities that lead to improved economic outcomes for all Americans — particularly our youth — ensuring that the conditions are ripe for innovation, freedom and flexibility throughout U.S. education.

As a non-partisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to great opportunities for all children, students and families, The Center for Education Reform does not endorse candidates or take political positions, but we will always recognize and applaud when someone takes a step to advance sound education policies.

Mike Pence: A True Pioneer of Educational Opportunity

Statement From CER Founder and CEO on Prospective VP Pence

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 14, 2016

CONTACT
Michelle Tigani
michelle@staging.edreform.com

WASHINGTON, DC —  Jeanne Allen, Founder and CEO of The Center for Education Reform, issued the following statement on presidential candidate Donald Trump’s pick of Indiana Governor Mike Pence as potential running mate:

“The race for president just got more interesting for education reformers – and more meaningful – if indeed, as the Indianapolis Star has just reported, Governor Mike Pence has been selected as Donald Trump’s running mate.

“Mike Pence is a true pioneer of educational opportunity, having advocated for parental choice and high standards for all schools, both as a think tank leader and radio host long before he ran for elected office.

“In Congress, Governor Pence supported pushing more authority to state and local leaders, using their money to pursue the innovations and programs that they best feel meet the needs of their schools, their communities.

“He has been an outspoken supporter of the critical right of parents to choose the school that is best for their children. Particularly in a time of great civil and international unrest, education holds the key to a competitive and productive nation.

“In the least predictable political election cycle in recent times, we look forward to the possible addition of the Governor’s historically unwavering conviction that education is the essential lever to expanding opportunity for all Americans.”

The Center for Education Reform does not endorse candidates, but we will always recognize when someone’s on the right side of parent power and excellence for kids. 

 

Mike Pence Is the Veep Education Reformers Need

Statement From CER Founder and CEO on Prospective VP Pence

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 14, 2016

CONTACT
Michelle Tigani
michelle@staging.edreform.com

WASHINGTON, DC —  Jeanne Allen, Founder and CEO of The Center for Education Reform, issued the following statement on presidential candidate Donald Trump’s pick of Indiana Governor Mike Pence as potential running mate:

“The race for president just got more interesting for education reformers – and more meaningful – if indeed, as the Indianapolis Star has just reported, Governor Mike Pence has been selected as Donald Trump’s running mate.

“Mike Pence is a true pioneer of educational opportunity, having advocated for parental choice and high standards for all schools, both as a think tank leader and radio host long before he ran for elected office.

“In Congress, Governor Pence supported pushing more authority to state and local leaders, using their money to pursue the innovations and programs that they best feel meet the needs of their schools, their communities.

“He has been an outspoken supporter of the critical right of parents to choose the school that is best for their children. Particularly in a time of great civil and international unrest, education holds the key to a competitive and productive nation.

“In the least predictable political election cycle in recent times, we look forward to the possible addition of the Governor’s historically unwavering conviction that education is the essential lever to expanding opportunity for all Americans.”

The Center for Education Reform does not endorse candidates, but we will always recognize when someone’s on the right side of parent power and excellence for kids. 

 

Mississippi’s Charter School Law: A Sad But Sitting Duck for a Lawsuit

A group claiming to work against poverty has filed a lawsuit against Mississippi’s fledgling and very modest charter school law that was intended to help poor kids. This is ironic at best, and harmful to kids, at worst. The Southern Poverty Law Center should be about eradicating poverty through the very foundation that holds the key to a child’s future and upward mobility – education! That great charter schools all over the nation are solving the achievement gap for the poor should be their model.

But then again, Mississippi’s charter school law was a sitting duck. sittingduck

As we argued when it was being debated, proponents should have demanded a law that allows for authorizing by school districts and universities, and provide for a high number of charters that could create a natural support base from the get-go. Allowing for institutions already publicly approved to spend taxpayer dollars to authorize charter schools not only avoids the creation of new bureaucracies but is legally sound.

Charter commissions, while held up as model, are fraught with challenges. In the few states that have them, commissions are becoming agents of charter-loathing state education departments who tack on more regulations and have narrow views of what innovation really is in public education.

That’s why we support and are advocating for strong laws that provide for multiple authorizers, a high or no cap on schools, fiscal equity and operational autonomy.

Laws that don’t provide for these are not laws worth having. They take just as much political capital to pass as does a pilot or weak law, but once enacted, they create more momentum to withstand increasing political pressure to roll back and over-regulate.

Like a weak-kneed bully who goes after the smallest kid on the block, Mississippi’s charter school cap of 15, its single bureaucratic authorizer and lack of meaningful funding made it a target, ripe for attack.

If we are always going to be challenged, then opportunity-minded reformers must fight for statewide charter laws that are both broad and deep. As one governor said to us recently, if we’re going to chase a rabbit, it might as well be a big one.

 

 

Newswire: July 12, 2016 — Potential VP candidate Mike Pence to headline forum — Charter Schools Go To Ballot in MA — FL teacher starts alternative school

WILL GOV PENCE STILL KEYNOTE OUR EDUCATION FORUM? When we finalized the roster for the CER-KEMP Foundation Forum on Parent Power, little did we know we had picked a potential VP candidate to headline it! Indiana Governor Mike Pence was sought out not only because he has led a state to expand and foster great education opportunities for kids, but he has been a stalwart supporter of empowering people to take control of their own lives and help them achieve the American Dream. This is the mantra of U.S. Senator Tim Scott (R-SC), who will also lead the Kemp Forum in Indy July 27th. It remains to be seen whether we will have to change our agenda, but for now, it’s heavy, deep and real. Go to staging.edreform.com for more information and to learn about other panelists.

Indiana Gov Mike Pence

CHARTER SCHOOLS HEAD TO BALLOT IN MA. Thankfully, bold-faced lies about charter school funding from The Save Our Public Schools Campaign in Massachusetts have not stopped more than 20,000 MA residents from making it known they want innovation and opportunity in education via charter schools. This is more than twice the amount of signatures needed to get charter school expansion on the November ballot!

secret.ballot

TEACHER-LED. Much like charter schools started by educators who simply wanted more freedom and flexibility to teach, Florida teacher Wendy Bradshaw is making headlines for starting her own private school. “The idea is to meet students where they are… It’s called R School because it’s our school, literally,” Bradshaw told The Ledger.

Screen Shot 2016-07-12 at 11.07.50 AM

THE NEW OPPORTUNITY AGENDA. If you’re worried about lagging student achievement, students who don’t know much about history (or lots of other things), too few choices for students, and too much bureaucracy in education, you’ll want to sign on to the New Opportunity Agenda today.

AAEAAQAAAAAAAAZlAAAAJDM2ODQxYjhkLTMxODktNGQwYi05OTM3LWM4M2MxMmU4MmExZA

INNOVATION + OPPORTUNITY= RESULTS
IN THE NEWS…

AGE AIN’T NOTHING BUT A NUMBER.

EDUCATION REFORM: ONE-SIZE-DOES-NOT-FIT-ALL.

A CALL TO ACTION FOR RENEWED FOCUS

Education Reform: One-Size-Does-Not-Fit-All

by Robert G. Holland
Heartland.org

Lately, education scholars at Washington, D.C.-based, nominally conservative think tanks have spun themselves into a tizzy about the education reform movement’s splintering into quarreling factions.

Who knew such a monolithic movement existed? Even among strong advocates of parental choice, lively arguments have raged for decades over vouchers versus tax-credit scholarships, with each side arguing its proposal is the most powerful and/or practical way to empower families. Debate is healthy in a democracy, is it not?

Thinking in terms of a single, cohesive agenda is perhaps more common in Washington, where think-tankers attend each other’s seminars and flock to government briefings. Why should any of this matter to the folks back in Grapevine or Grand Forks? Because advocacy from think-alike think tanks may influence policy in their school districts.

Within these inner sanctums, there is concern about contrary ideologies intruding. In a May 25 essay, Thomas B. Fordham Institute Fellow Robert Pondiscio controversially observed, “Like the proverbial frog in a pot, education reformers on the political right find themselves coming to a slow boil in the cauldron of social justice activism.”

As an example, Pondiscio reported conservative reformers “feeling unwelcome, uncomfortable, and cowed into silence” at a recent meeting of the New Schools Venture Fund in San Francisco. He fretted about leftists aggressively promoting a new orthodoxy on issues of race, class, and gender within the context of education reform while excluding conservative ideas. But what is wrong with having the gumption to debate the reform newcomers instead of acting as though your side owns this turf?

Speaking of taking ownership, the long-time CEO of the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Education Reform, Jeanne Allen, issued a 22-page “manifesto” on June 15 — under her byline — seeking to reframe choice-based reform in terms of “innovation and opportunity,” as though those objectives are new“This is a clarion call,” she announced in the opening sentence.

Much of the manifesto deals in great detail with the level of tolerance for semi-autonomous charter schools within government-controlled school systems over the years. There is nothing about the tremendous promise of the next-generation voucher, the education savings account, and there is little about a steady increase in states adopting private-choice programs and the phenomenal growth of homeschooling.

Allen’s manifesto expresses frustration that “our efforts to drive change have hit a wall. The reality is that more was accomplished in the first nine years of the education reform movement than in the past 16.”

That reference is to the pace of states adopting strong charter-school authorization laws since 1991. Some states and localities now seek to drag charters back under a regulatory umbrella, and that legitimately concerns advocates. (Of course, charter schools are far from constituting the entirety of the education reform movement.)

Charters have helped thousands of families find a tuition-free alternative to conventional public schools, and that is a good thing. However, because charter schools operate within the governmental system, the nature of the larger, controlling agenda becomes relevant.

In that connection, the manifesto actually laments the demise of the federal No Child Left Behind law because it helped set the bar for student proficiency and defined the terms of accountability. The manifesto goes further and hammers the debate over Common Core as a “distraction” that “has drained our collective energies and focus on students.”

Actually, the parents across the nation who have stood up against nationalized standards being imposed on their schools are entirely focused on students — their children and their neighbors’ children. And they see clearly that Common Core uniformity and true choice in education are incompatible. The manifesto is likely to deepen their suspicion that choice becomes problematic when linked to an agenda imposed from the top down.

So, what is the clear call for action, the clarion call? Its name is the New Opportunity Agenda, the tenets of which are to be “innovation, flexibility, opportunity, and transparency.” The ideas discussed include drawing on new educational technologies, starting new schools, allowing public funds to follow children to schools of choice, and reporting test data in ways that can show how schools and districts are performing.

The prospect of yet another agenda being developed by Washington insiders and passed down to the people may excite some who call themselves “education reformers,” but a different kind of reformer will argue for families having the freedom to pursue their own agendas for their children — with their individual decisions contributing to a vibrant marketplace that reshapes the face of U.S. education.

Even though there is not a single education reform movement, there are ideas on which agenda-driven and liberty-loving advocates may agree. They should be able to talk with each other — and even welcome social-justice warriors to the conversation.

[Originally published at the American Spectator]