Sign up for our newsletter

The Conclusion to an Educational Journey

Three weeks ago I was starting my first day at the Center for Education Reform (CER), and now I’m concluding my experience with the organization. My experience with CER has been educational and I have acquired more knowledge about the education field as a result. My daily task included uploading information from articles that were sent to my email daily into CER database. Everyday I learned something new, whether it was a school facing closure, a new policy being introduced, teachers being evaluated, or even the teachers union advocating for what they believe in. As a junior in high school I’m used to loud students on a daily basis but at CER the environment is completely professional; and I soon caught on to what the adult work environment is like.

During my second week at the organization all of the interns had a pizza lunch, in which they gave me advice on college and answered any questions of mine. Today is my last day and I am thankful for having the opportunity to complete a fellowship at CER. My knowledge about education has increased since being at CER but now my time at the organization has come to an end, and everything that I have learned about education will be displayed this upcoming year when I complete my senior thesis assignment. Senior thesis is a requirement for graduation and the main assignments include a fifteen-page paper on a public policy topic as well as a presentation. I look forward to completing my thesis on a topic that revolves around education because I can apply everything that I have learned while working with CER. Thanks for everything Center for Education Reform!

Imani Jenkins, César Chávez Charter School Fellow

The World Cup and Education: A Common Bond

The 1990 World Cup in Italy marked the first time in 40 years that the U.S. Men’s National Team played in soccer’s biggest international tournament.

Over the last two decades, the U.S. has played in every World Cup since, and draws in record ratings as many Americans rediscover their newfound interest in soccer every four years.

And during that time, some American soccer players such as Landon Donovan or Alexi Lalas have become more or less household names. Based on the absolutely ankle-shattering move to facilitate the first goal against Ghana in the US opening match, Clint Dempsey is probably next in line.

Like American interest in soccer, education reform policies have also taken shape over the last couple of decades, from the increasing popularity in opportunity scholarship programs, https://staging.edreform.com/2013/12/americas-attitudes-towards-education-reform-public-support-for-accountability-in-schools/ to the increased foothold of charter schools. While parental interest in their child’s education is nothing new, parents and community members have taken a newfound consideration in how these new innovations can boost opportunities for students.

As the U.S. team and individual players continue to gain traction in the eyes of the American public, so have large and small charter operators and school choice movements across the states. https://staging.edreform.com/in-the-states/map/

Many Americans view the game of soccer as a slog. It’s a drawn out, seemingly futile exercise that stays the same for most of the time, with intermittent bursts of excitement and success.

Those who have tried — and continue to try – to create choice and accountability in schools can likely relate to the sentiment that comes with efforts of trying to shake up an otherwise static system.

Soccer and education share a common notorious bond in the sense that both contain an inordinate amount of players who flop and then feign injury to gain unfair advantages against those who flat out play better.

Supporters of the toxic California tenure policies overturned in Vergara v. California https://staging.edreform.com/2014/06/california-court-affirms-student-rights/ amount to the Oscar-worthy World Cup competitor who writhes on the ground for a nonexistent injury.

U.S. Coach Jurgen Klinsmann has said the squad is still in building mode, but has high expectations for the future.

Education Reformers could say the same.

Shyamalan “Got Schooled”

The National Press Club hosted a luncheon with the internationally recognized film writer and director, M. Night Shyamalan. Shyamalan has written and directed many movies including The Sixth Sense (1999), which was nominated for six Academy Awards including Best Picture. How is this Hollywood superstar related to education reform? Shyamalan recently published a book, I Got Schooled, based solely on empirical data to a solution to close the existing education gap in the United States that exists between the success of students in inner city schools compared to their suburban counter parts.

In 2007, Shyamalan was scouting two schools in Philadelphia as locations for a movie when he came across the horrifying discrepancies that existed in schools. He became intrigued with the issue and spent four years attempting to collect and organize data on the differences in schools.

Inspired by the idea that humans only need to do five basic things to stay healthy for a lifetime, Shyamalan utilized the data he collected to uncover a five-item solution that all schools could implement in be successful in providing a sustainable education for all students. The five things he developed are (1) a loud and consistent culture of strong leadership (2) properly trained teachers (3) consistent data collection on effective practices (4) more time in a school setting, and (5) small schools.

Shyamalan describes that all five factors are necessary, and no one item is sufficient on its own or without another. It is important for principals to spend their time teaching the teachers and utilizing the entire school to maintain a culture of growth, instead of relying one classroom alone to provide a fulfilling education for students. Teachers need to be trained “like a navy seal” in order to be successful in the schools, and currently teachers and principals are being held unfairly accountable when they are not being trained properly.

Students should be spending more time stimulated by school environments in order to close the gap and succeed at the same level as their peers. For example, over the summers, some students are being challenged and improving their skills, while others are falling behind. Lastly, students should be taught in small schools because these changes cannot be made in big schools.

Shyamalan concluded his thoughts with the focus on the fact that we can make every effort to change how schools are developed in order to diminish the achievement gap, but we cannot ignore the messages that inner city kids are receiving outside of their schools about their place in society. There is a collective effort that is needed for the growth and development of students in schools across the country.

Mandy Leiter, CER Intern

NEWSWIRE: June 17, 2014

Vol. 16, No. 24

CREDIT WHERE CREDIT’S DUE. In the past three years, there has been a rapid creation of tax credit-funded scholarship programs across 14 states. Eager to determine whether these programs were actually increasing parental access to more and better educational choices, CER conducted a ranking and state-by-state comparison to encourage best practices. Some states (Arizona and Florida) not only cast a wide net in terms of funding and student eligibility, but also follow through in actually implementing the program. While their tax credit programs may not be at the bottom of the barrel in terms of structure, actual implementation in other states (looking at you, Louisiana) is not delivering on the promise. At the end of the day, lawmakers should ask the question of how to best expand parental choice, and sound tax credit scholarship programs are one option in what should be a diverse portfolio of educational opportunities that can continue to boost student outcomes. Read the full report here.

VERGARA VICTORY STILL SHINING. The huge victory for both students and educators in Vergara v. California has not only stimulated governmental action across the states, but has also served as a catalyst for a conversation surrounding what’s best for students while honoring teachers as professionals. The clear and unequivocal nature of the Vergara ruling affirming equality of education as a civil rights issue has highlighted the types of antiquated employment practices that defy common sense and what’s best for students. Unions are fighting the current policy shift in favor of more accountability in schools, and Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead. And unions are miraculously doing it without actually mentioning policy terms such as ‘tenure’ and ‘seniority’ (can’t have that pesky veil lifted). Vergara may have originated in a state judiciary system, but has now officially been brought to the court of public opinion, and it’s winning that battle too.

RAISING ARIZONA. A very happy 20th anniversary to Arizona’s charter school law and all of the pioneers who helped make it happen. As it stands now, this southwestern bastion of Parent Power has the fifth strongest charter law in the nation. In addition to multiple, independent charter authorizers, charter schools in Arizona are supported by teacher autonomy, the absence of a cap on schools created, and assistance with facility funding. Whether applied to charter laws or school choice as a whole, it’s clear Arizona appreciates the importance of structuring policies correctly to maximize the number of families who stand to benefit from choice, as they also earn an “A” on CER’s new education tax credit scholarship ranking & scorecard, out today!

LET’S GET DIGITAL. CER wasn’t the only group to release a report today encouraging innovation at the state policy level. A new report from the Aspen Institute prescribes ways on integrating technology to help students best master learning content and adapt to newly available resources. Two key things the report accomplishes is recognition of the urgency with which we must act to improve a stagnant education system, and how digital learning can be part of that solution. Similar to tax credit scholarship programs and school choice overall, online learning options have proliferated rapidly in recent years, allowing students to engage in a form of education best suited to their needs.

SENIOR SIGNING DAY. In a crowded auditorium, graduating seniors of Democracy Prep in New York City walked out onto the stage, introduced themselves and the college where they’ll be attending next fall, at which point each graduate was promptly met with resounding applause. It’s one of the more inspirational spectacles in education today, and a demonstration of the positive role charter schools are playing in New York and elsewhere. Unsurprisingly to anyone familiar with the high expectations and positively rigorous Democracy Prep academic program, it takes more than a few minutes to get through all the students. While policy reports are critical in providing guidance on best practices, it’s critical to provide reminders of the real results of school choice and innovation.

Parent Powered Technology

Education experts gathered at the New America Foundation this morning to offer remarks and panel discussion on the subject “Anytime, Anywhere Summer Learning: Connecting Young Children and Their Families to Early Literacy Opportunities.”

Special Assistant to the President for Education Policy Roberto Rodriguez, National Summer Learning Association CEO Sarah Pitcock, and NYU Professor of Early Childhood and Literacy Education Susan Neuman, among others, shared insights into the opportunities and obstacles of applying technology to combat the effects of summer learning loss.

The “summer slide,” as it’s called, marks both the reversal of academic gains made during the year and a further wedge between the educational outcomes of students from high and low socioeconomic backgrounds. As the panelists observed, students of middle and upper income families often continue to engage in learning opportunities outside the classroom–reading books at home, taking trips to museums, joining storytelling groups at libraries, etc.– while those from lower income families lose access to such academic stimulation over the summer and regress 2-3 months in core proficiencies.

Michael Levine, Founding Director of the Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop, observed that there is “no new dose of some magical concoction” to undo and prevent the slide, and Ms. Pitcock added that even “an 8-week comprehensive summer program is not the best fit for every child and family.” Rather, the need is for “a variety of solutions.”

In discussing these solutions, the panelists delved into the question “What role does and should technology play?”

Terri Clark of Read on Arizona (fittingly using technology to join the event via Skype) outlined a recent initiative to establish a “digital library” accessible to all students of the Grand Canyon State, and multiple panelists spoke enthusiastically of the potential benefits of rolling out reading apps, expanding technology resources at libraries in high need areas, etc.

Yet for all the enthusiasm to invest in new technologies and educational innovations, one point loomed above all else: parental engagement. As Mr. Levine stressed, the efforts to harness technology require reaching and mobilizing parents, encouraging them to promote at home reading and a culture of family literacy.

Prof. Neuman cautioned against becoming “so enamored of technology and apps that [we] forget the human connection,” and Yolie Flores, Senior Fellow at the Campaign for Grade-Level Reading, added, “[It] must not be about replacing adults”, but rather “equipping them…[It’s] first and foremost about relationships, and [remembering] that technology is a tool.”

As if straight out of CER herself, Ms. Gutierrez summed it up as follows: “Keep parents and parent power at the center of this work.”

Center for Education Reform gives Alabama Accountability Act scholarship plan an F

Mike Cason, The Hunstville Times

MONTGOMERY, Alabama — A national group that promotes tax-credit funded private school scholarships gives the scholarship plan created under the Alabama Accountability Act a grade of F.

In a report released today, The Center for Education Reform rated Alabama’s law weakest among 14 states that it said have such programs.

The report from the center, which supports school choice and charter schools, did not fault the accountability act for the reason critics usually do — that it diverts tax dollars from public to private schools.

The report rated Alabama’s law poorly because it said the plan will limit participation.

Under the accountability act, donors pay for the scholarships by giving to scholarship granting organizations. Donors get a credit on their state income taxes. Those are income tax dollars that would otherwise go to public education.

The accountability act caps the total income tax credits at $25 million a year. The center’s report praised other states, including Arizona and Florida, that allow their caps to rise based on demand.

The report also criticized Alabama’s law because it places many requirements on the private schools that accept the scholarships.

The center faulted Alabama for allowing scholarships only to students from public schools labeled as failing. But that’s partly wrong. Students from any Alabama school, public or private, can receive scholarships if the scholarship organizations have money left after Sept. 15 each year.

The accountability act does place an income limit on eligibility — up to 150 percent of the state median income. The median is about $41,000.

The Center for Education Reform, based in Washington, D.C., said tax-credit funded scholarships pay tuition for about 190,000 students nationally.

As for the criticism that the programs hurt public school funding, the report says the lost revenue is often less than the state would spend per pupil. “A significant benefit of these scholarship programs is to shift the power of choosing a child’s education from the government to the child’s parent,” the report says.

Half of the states with scholarship programs set them up within the last three years, the report said. Alabama’s law passed in 2013.

Here’s how other state laws graded:

A — Arizona and Florida. The report said Arizona’s law encourages the greatest participation by students and donors, with an automatic escalator that increases the tax credits allowed by 20 percent each year the maximum is reached.

The report praised Florida’s law for increasing the income eligibility level, dropping a requirement that only public school students are eligible, and having an automatic escalator clause of 25 percent if at least 80 percent of allowed credits are claimed.

B — Georgia, Pennsylvania, Indiana and Virginia.

C — Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Louisiana and Oklahoma.

D — Rhode Island and Kansas.

The report also ranked the states on participation and implementation, but said that programs in Alabama, South Carolina and Kansas are too new to evaluate.

Alabama’s law faces a state court challenge.

Montgomery County Circuit Judge Gene Reese ruled last month that the law violated the state constitution because of the secretive way it passed the Legislature, because it violates a constitutional requirement that income tax revenue be used only for public school teacher salaries and because it violates constitutional restrictions on tax dollars going to private schools and charitable organizations.

The state and parents who intervened in the case are appealing to the Alabama Supreme Court.

Reese issued an injunction against further use of the law but agreed to lift that while the appeal is pending.

Two previous lawsuits that attempted to block the AAA failed.

 

From Arizona to Alabama: Ranking the Country’s Education Tax-Credit Laws

Arianna Prothero
Education Week
June 17th, 2014

Arizona and Florida have the strongest education tax-credit scholarship programs in the country while Alabama’s law is the weakest according to a ranking released today by the Center for Education Reform, a school choice advocacy and research group.

The Bethesda, Md.-based CER assigned letter grades to the 14 states that have enacted education tax-credit laws, which allow businesses or individuals to claim tax-credits for donations made to approved scholarship organizations, grading them based primarily on how well funded each program is and how many students they serve.

Click here to read the rest of the article.

New Ranking of School Choice Programs Reveals Need for Strong Laws that Facilitate Greater Participation

First Edition of Education Tax Credit Scholarships Ranking & Scorecard Released

CER Press Release
Washington, D.C.
June 17, 2014

Out of 14 states that have tax credit-funded scholarship programs, two earn A’s, five earn B’s, four earn C’s, two earn D’s, and one earns an F on a new ranking and analysis from the Center for Education Reform (CER), School Choice Today: Education Tax Credit Scholarships Ranking & Scorecard 2014 released today. The first of its kind, the Education Tax Credit Scholarships Ranking & Scorecard 2014 is an in-depth analysis and state-by-state comparison of the 14 tax credit-funded scholarship programs currently in existence.

“Half of the 14 states that currently have tax credit-funded scholarship programs have enacted them in the past three years alone, so a review of the policy and implementation is necessary to ensure states don’t become complacent with just having a law on the books,” said Kara Kerwin, president of CER. “It’s time to assess whether or not these programs are truly increasing access to educational options, so more states can respond to increased parental demand for choice.”

Tax credit-funded scholarship programs now pay tuition for approximately 190,000 students, a school-choice program participation level that is surpassed only by enrollment in charter schools.

One of the key findings of the Education Tax Credit Scholarships Ranking & Scorecard 2014 is that states with the five highest-rated laws ranked in the top six spots in measures of student & donor participation.

“What the Education Tax Credit Scholarships Ranking & Scorecard 2014 reveals is that we need more states with strong laws, because strong laws facilitate greater participation in school choice programs,” said Brian Backstrom, lead researcher and author of the report and a senior advisor to CER.

When evaluating tax credit-funded scholarship programs, the Education Tax Credit Scholarships Ranking & Scorecard 2014 takes into consideration not only the program’s design, but implementation as well, in order to assess whether the program is truly helping the greatest amount of families possible choose a better educational option. CER assesses tax credit-funded scholarship programs based on five major components:

• Eligibility requirements & provider availability;
• Tax credit & scholarship design;
• Preservation of private school autonomy;
• Budget; and
• Participation & implementation.

Kara Kerwin, president of CER, and Brian Backstrom, a senior policy advisor to CER and lead researcher and author of this report, are available for comment on the Education Tax Credit Scholarships Ranking & Scorecard 2014. Members of the media should contact CER Communications Director Michelle Tigani at 301-986-8088 or michelle@staging.edreform.com to set up interviews.

Click here to read School Choice Today: Education Tax Credit Scholarships Ranking & Scorecard 2014

Teacher Union Wordsmiths

Mike Antonucci, Intercepts

I went over the press releases and statements on the Vergara decision from the various teachers’ unions and have drawn a few inferences about their communications strategy going forward. The language used – and omitted – appears to be highly crafted, polled and focus-grouped.

The NEA press release and statement from president Dennis Van Roekel includes in the first two sentences the words “multimillionaire,” “ultra-rich,” “deep-pocketed,” “corporate” (twice), “special interests,” and “privatizing.”

Missing from the statement are the words “seniority” or “tenure” (or its stand-in, “due process”). Instead there are two references to “experience,” which signals the angle NEA will probably take.

AFT president Randi Weingarten had a different emphasis. She mentioned “due process” and “teacher protections,” but also omitted “tenure” and “seniority.”

She did not use “corporate” at all and “wealthy” only once, but money was in her message. She referenced “budget crises,” “full and fair funding,” “funding inequities” and “high poverty.”

The California Teachers Association referred to “professional rights,” “these laws” and “challenged statutes” in lieu of “tenure” and “experience” in lieu of “seniority.” CTA focused on the conduct of the trial itself, though it also mentioned “millionaire” and “corporate.”

The California Federation of Teachers emphasized “taking away rights from teachers.” CFT followed Weingarten’s lead in “underfunding, poverty, and economic inequality,” but mirrored NEA in using “experience.” CFT did mention “due process,” but did not use “seniority” or “tenure.”

The outlier is the Chicago Teachers Union and its president, Karen Lewis. CTU used “tenure” prominently in its press release and spent a lot of space defending it. Much of the statement deals with the “calculated deprivation of resources.” Seniority is not mentioned.

My view of all this is that the unions will, as they have in the past, score well with the general public when attacking evil corporate puppetmasters. But judging from the media reports of the Vergara ruling – almost all of which prominently use “seniority” and “tenure” – they will have an uphill battle altering the public perception of protecting bad teachers.

Regardless of merits, in communications whichever side has to do the explaining is the side that loses. The legal process will be long and drawn-out. The PR process will be immediate and unrelenting.

 

Lay out the welcome mat for charter schools

Kara Kerwin, Frederick News Post

On the campaign trail back in 2010, former Maryland Gov. Bob Ehrlich conceded that Maryland’s charter school law did not go far enough in creating the necessary safeguards for a thriving charter sector statewide, and more needed to be done to ensure charter schools become a welcomed part of public education.

Four years later, Frederick Classical Charter School is coming to terms with this revelation, as administrators are hitting roadblocks in efforts to secure equitable funding for their students — students who deserve the same resources as students in other public schools.

Upon receiving funding for the upcoming fiscal year from Frederick County Public Schools, Frederick Classical realized a disparity in transportation money, a category under which the school is entitled to receive funding, according to state law. Moreover, Frederick Classical, whether in its initial charter agreed upon with local authorities or subsequently, never forfeited rights to receive such funding. School leaders know full well that any such acknowledgment would potentially undercut critical resources for students.

Now, Frederick Classical must find ways to make up for the shortfall in the most efficient way possible, an unfortunate predicament with which charter schools nationwide are sadly all too familiar.

Maryland’s charter school law is particularly weak, especially when it comes to funding. According to state law and by the direct admission of the state Board of Education, charter school students are not entitled to equitable funding, but, rather, whatever “commensurate” per-pupil formula the local district chooses to apply. This inevitably leads to students in some schools receiving more resources than others, a concept so morally corrupt it’s a wonder how it continues to be tolerated.

The state Board of Education has virtually no authority when it comes to chartering matters. Without multiple independent charter authorizers such as universities that have proven track records of successful charter oversight and accountability in other states, local districts wield unbridled power over funding and operational decisions.

Because Maryland’s charter school law has not been updated to follow best practices, all of these problems are now playing out in Frederick. This situation should be an eye-opener for lawmakers to realize that Maryland’s charter law needs to change to ensure all students, regardless of what type of public school they attend, deserve better, and so contentious situations like these can be avoided in the future.

In the meantime, the onus is on local officials to acknowledge flawed external conditions, and respond to the realities on the ground. There should be an objective among all parties involved to work together and do what’s necessary to give a positive educational experience to all students, including those who attend Frederick Classical.

The district is entirely within its power to adjust the per-pupil allotment, and Frederick Classical is entirely eligible to not only receive equitable funding but also more than capable to use it effectively.

A willingness to collaborate and overcome a systemic problem, which requires the attention of state lawmakers to remedy through structural change in the charter law, would not only represent bold leadership, but also create an overall positive environment for all schools in Frederick County, both charter and traditional.

Like many other local school leaders, the founders of Frederick Classical are dedicated members of the community with the genuine goal of presenting a viable school for students who could benefit from their learning model. Like many other charter schools that strive to fill an educational niche, Frederick Classical relies on the local support of families, to whom educators and administrators are accountable, first and foremost. After undergoing a multi-year-long application process, Frederick Classical opened its doors with local approval in August 2013.

Frederick Classical’s school motto is “Nil sine magno labore,” or, “Nothing without great labor.” Truer words have never been spoken.

Kara Kerwin is president of the Center for Education Reform, based in Washington.