Sign up for our newsletter

Connecticut’s Choice Programs Evaluated in New Study

The Connecticut State Department of Education has released a study showing statistically significant improvement on the Connecticut state test, called the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT), for students in some schools of choice.

The study used innovative control groups to “match” samples of students in the traditional public schools to those in schools of choice by various demographic data, baseline scores on state tests, and percentage of special needs or English Language Learner students. The study found improvements on the CMT in magnet schools and the open choice program for students studied from the 3rd to 5th grades, while charters showed statistically significant gains only in the 6th to 8th grade cohort. Because the matching groups carefully controlled for where students started, the gains in schools of choice observed in this study are unlikely to be chalked up to differences in the student bodies.

In addition to the findings above, move specific results from the study include:

• Among 3rd to 5th graders, Regional Educational Service Centers (RESC), or regionally-run magnet schools of choice improved the percentage of students that scored proficient by 25.4 points, compared with 4.4 percent in non-choice urban schools, for an overall proficiency bump from 58.2 to 83.6.
• The Open Choice program, which allows students to choose public schools across ZIP-code based enrollment lines, performed almost as well in the 3rd to 5th grade cohort, improving proficiency by 19.1 percentage points, going from under half to almost two-thirds of students scoring proficient.
• Although charter schools showed no statistically significant improvement in the 3rd to 5th grade cohort, they showed the biggest improvement in the 6th to 8th grade group, improving proficiency by 8 percentage points, from 73.3 to 81.3 percent. This improvement was much larger than the next highest groups, in the Open Choice program, of 2.6 percentage points, and non-urban schools, with 1.8 percentage points of improvement.
• Gains at the “Goal” level (higher than proficiency) were even larger for charter schools in the 6th to 8th grade cohort, at 10.7 percentage points of improvement, demonstrating a “higher level of learning and understanding.”

For more about the study, read “New study finds Choice programs effective in raising academic achievement” via the West Hartford News.

For more about school choice in Connecticut, see CER’s Parent Power Index.

Lawsuit aims to block charter school from co-locating

by Carl Campanile
New York Post
June 15, 2015

The war against the Success Academy charter schools network of Eva Moskowitz continues with a vengeance.

A Manhattan federal suit filed Friday aims to block Bronx Success Academy 3 from co-locating at an under-used building at 1000 Teller Ave. shared by four other small schools.

The suit claims allowing Bronx SA3 into the building will violate the rights of special education students under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act. About a quarter of the students are identified as having special needs and have individualized education plans, according to plaintiffs’ lawyer, Arthur Schwartz.

Read More

School voucher program on hold for N.C. Supreme Court

by Emery P. Dalesio, Associated Press
Wilmington Star-News
June 13, 2015

A state program that uses taxpayer money to pay student tuition at private and religious schools is headed for uncertainty for the second straight year as North Carolina judge grapple with whether it’s constitutional.

The latest batch of rulings by the N.C. Supreme Court last week didn’t include its decision on whether the Opportunity Scholarships program can continue. The court isn’t scheduled to issue opinions again until late August, about the time classes resume for the new academic year.

Though the Supreme Court could announce a decision in the voucher case before then, parents such as KC Cooper of Statesville are facing weeks of wondering whether a ruling could mean pulling their child out of school after classes start. It looked like that was possible last August, when a trial judge ruled the program an unconstitutional use of state money. Appeals court judges stepped in weeks later and allowed the money to flow for the year.

“This uncertainty, it’s something that I don’t want to give energy to. I want to keep the faith and believe that it will push through just like last year,” said Cooper, 42, who used the voucher program to enroll her special-needs 7th-grader in a Christian school last fall.

Read More

Day One As An Intern

I’m a rising senior at Catholic University (CUA) right here in Washington, D.C. Coming into my internship at the Center for Education Reform (CER), I did not know what to expect. I came to CUA as a psychology major with the intention of going to school for speech language pathology and embarking on a career working with children, something I’ve always had a passion for.

During my time at CUA, I have served as a tutor for D.C. Reads, an initiative that engages college students in tutoring D.C.’s schoolchildren to improve literacy, as well as interned for Urban Promise, a Camden, New Jersey based nonprofit that creates opportunities for low-income students. I began asking myself some very tough questions – why do some children in America have access to an excellent education, and others don’t? Is education truly the great equalizer?

I began to see myself working as a policymaker rather than working hands-on with children, and became especially passionate about higher education and college access for all students regardless of their socioeconomic status. This desire to really make a difference led me to apply to the CER Internship, and now, here I am!

My first day has led me to getting to know the CER staff and the background of the education reform movement. A lunch with CER President Kara Kerwin on my first day allowed all the summer interns to sit down and get perspective and insight on CER’s work. CER is the perfect place for me to spend the summer and I can’t wait to see where my summer at CER takes me.

Emma Dodson, CER Intern

The Numbers Game

My motivations for becoming an English Major were simple: I could read and discuss literature daily and it was as far away from math and science, specifically numbers, as I could get. Numbers are not my strength; my math skills are severely limited to simple addition and subtraction. Much to my chagrin, I was enlightened about the influence of numbers by an event regarding college-ready policies in the classroom hosted by the New America Foundation.

The keynote speaker, Jack Markell, the Governor of Delaware, as well as the panelists, Joel Vargas and Elisabeth Barnett, discussed the importance of bringing college into the high school classroom and changing curricula and school policy to ensure that students are best prepared for the rigor of the college classroom. All three individuals agreed on the importance of standardized testing and GPA to measure college readiness, but included the importance of implementing a diversified array of tests.

Although these different tests have different means of presentation and indicate different metrics, each test measures success through statistics and scores – marking the high influence of numbers in America’s education systems. Although the test might change, the means of measuring success does not. Each individual was in agreement that no single test can determine success, but GPA is the best measure implemented at the moment to determine a student’s potential success rate in college.

The universality of numbers plays into the high level of numbers in school; it’s easy to group large students together and have students fall under subsets of measures of success, but students shouldn’t fall under categories. This only reduces students to a number, rather than allowing their unique characteristics to predict their future success as college students. Instead, students should be individuals, not part of a group.

I agree that test scores and GPA are indicators of success, but I disagree that they are the only adequate ways to measure success. I think that success is more than a GPA; student motivation, determination, and will to succeed are also measures of success. Combining qualitative and quantitative measures to predict success rates would allow individuals to have a unique identity in schools rather than be labeled by a number and generic category.

Rethinking education is gaining traction in the 21st century on the basis that classrooms haven’t changed in several decades. Why aren’t measures of success being rethought as well? Tests scores and numbers have continually defined students in the past, isn’t it time for a shift in schools to make students individuals rather than numbers?

Elizabeth Kennard, CER Intern

Newswire: June 9, 2015

Vol. 17, No. 23

DIPLOMAS COUNT. Education Week released its annual Diplomas Count special report earlier this week on high school graduation rates nationwide. Next Steps: Life After Special Education lays out high school graduation data disaggregated by ethnic group, as well as by English learner, socioeconomic, and disability status. Although the report lauds the eight out of 10 public high school students that graduate with a diploma, it acknowledges that that number masks deep gaps between groups. African-Americans and American Indians, for example, graduate just roughly 70 percent of the time, while only six in 10 students with disabilities and English learners earn a diploma. The report also highlights the stories and varied post-school pathways of students with disabilities, exposing a “fractured” policy landscape that leaves many families in the dark about their options.

GRIT. Eighth graders in the U.S. are 36 percent proficient in reading and 35 percent proficient in math according to the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), more commonly known as the Nation’s Report Card, a federal testing program designed to provide a snapshot of student achievement. Despite the fact that not even 50 percent of our kids can read and do math at grade level, the announcement came yesterday that the Nation’s Report Card wants to measure students’ grit. Maybe instead the feds should be measuring the grit of state lawmakers and leaders and whether or not they have what it takes to pass real reforms that translate into real results for parents and kids. Nevada would certainly earn points for its grit, passing not one, but two school choice measures this legislative session, the most recent being a universal Education Savings Account (ESA) program signed into law last week by Governor Sandoval. Of course now that Nevada lawmakers have shown their grit, leaders there must make sure the law is implemented as intended, giving parents ultimate power over their child’s education.

BLINDERS. School choice is a truly bipartisan issue when it comes down to it (tri-partisan actually, with 79 percent of Republicans in support of school choice, 73 percent of Democrats, and 71 percent of Independents), but unfortunately political blinders tend to get in the way of seeing an issue for what it’s truly worth, and in the case of school choice, that means seeing the issue from a parent or child’s perspective. The most disheartening thing to creating more and better opportunities for our children is the closed minds of those so vehemently against school choice, writes a charter school graduate’s mom who admits that if you had asked her opinion on charter schools a few years ago she would have said she didn’t like them because of the way the media reports on the scandals and “scurrilous motives” of these schools, giving her an impression of supposed separateness from the public system. What we need to see in the media are more reports and stories of the success of school choice opportunities, like how the SABIS® International Charter School (SICS) in Springfield, Massachusetts ranked among the best high schools in America and was awarded its sixth consecutive silver medal from U.S. News & World Report.

TENURE UPHELD. Last week, a North Carolina Appeals court ruled lawmakers’ attempt to end teacher tenure unconstitutional on the basis that it amounted to an illegal taking of contract and property rights. While N.C. Association of Educators’ president Rodney Ellis tells the News & Observer tenure is a “critical tool to recruit and retain quality educators,” any policy that prioritizes a hire date is an injustice not only to students, but to teachers who deserve merit-based appreciation like other professionals. Thankfully, in other parts of the U.S., such as in California last year with the headliner Vergara vs. California case, courts are ruling against archaic employment practices like tenure and “last in, first out” retention policies that do nothing to support teachers who go the extra mile for students day in and day out. And in fact, poll results reveal rising support for rewarding teachers for performance, with 59 percent in support of taking student performance into consideration when it comes to compensating teachers in 2005, to 62 percent support in October 2013.

#EDPOLICYLEADERS. We’ve been telling you about the latest EdReformU™ course for the past few weeks (enrollment for History of Charter Schools is now closed, but stay tuned for application information for the second offering of EdReformU™’s foundational course, Decline and Fall of the U.S. Education System), but did you know that another standout education reform organization, Foundation for Excellence in Education, has a series of self-paced online courses designed for lawmakers, local education leaders and reform advocates? Check out the three different course offerings here that deal with the various elements of education reform from data privacy to communications.

César Chávez Symposium

Every year, seniors at Chávez schools present and defend their theses, which focus on current public policy issues, during the César Chávez Public Charter Schools Public Policy Symposium. Students include a background of the issue, analysis of the policy, and their recommendations on how to improve/change the policy in their thesis presentations. This year’s topics ranged from the militarization of the police to the conflicts in Israel/Palestine. The three seniors who presented their theses rivaled that of a college student well into their studies. Each presentation was a thoughtful piece that brought me into their minds and helped me understand the basis of their thesis.Chavez Signs

Before the student presentations, keynote speaker Jamal Simmons, who plays an active role in politics and helped both Bill Clinton and Barack Obama win elections, spoke about his idea of “Generation One”. Generation One includes the millennials who he described as having a greater scope of things that they can become in life compared to earlier generations. He recounted a popular saying from when he was younger about minority parents telling their kids that they can be anything they want in life, and parents knowing they were not telling the truth. Children then suffered from the generational suppression that lasted decades before them. This is unlike today, when there are people who look just like them who are owners of television networks or even President of the United States. Today, Generation One believes they can indeed be anything they want in life.

This led us into the student presentations, and it was clear that these students are a part of Generation One (in fact, they might be the next leaders of Generation One!). The first presenter spoke about student loan debt, and provided his very own solution to help with the debt crisis, including rethinking grants and lowering interest rates. Another presenter compelled the audience to action to bring peace between Israel and Palestine, and may even be a prospect for Secretary of Defense one day. Last but not least, one student tackled the issue of the militarization of police and, in light of the “battles” in Ferguson and Baltimore, presented a proposal that would enforce police body cameras and a cop-watch database.

The symposium was a fantastic opportunity to engage with students and get their take on real world problems and solutions. Overall, the symposium showed that the program the Chávez schools are offering to their students will more than prepare them for a successful journey as college students and beyond. As an advocate for parent choice, I can honestly say if this symposium is an indicator of the things being done at César Chávez Public Charter Schools, then these parents made a great choice.

Rahdaysha Cummings, CER Intern

Touring D.C. International Public Charter School

Last week, CER Interns attended a First Fridays Tour at D.C. International Public Charter School (DCI). Mary Shaffner, the Executive Director, founded the school in 2014 with “the mission of training students to become multilingual, culturally competent and capable of taking their learning to the next level.” Each student engages in partial language immersion in content-based instruction classes in Spanish, French, or Mandarin Chinese.

During the tour, one aspect of DCI that struck us the most was the considerable amount of racial, intellectual, and economic diversity. Forty percent of students are African American, 27 percent are Latino/a, 26 percent are Caucasian, and 7 percent are Asian. A majority of students take part in the free and reduced meals program, and 20 percent of students receive special education. The tour showcased this variety by bringing us to different classes, and focused on the school’s distinctive elements, like its concentration on language and effective implementation of technology in the classroom.Students finalize their presentations

DCI heavily relies on intensive language immersion. Students take language classes every day, and take other classes in in the student’s target language. Roughly 50 percent of a student’s day involves using their target language to, for example, discuss controversial topics, write reports, or read articles about current events.

Technology is also highly used in the classroom. Each student has their own Chromebook that can be used for independent projects, homework, assessments, and research. Technology gives students access to a wealth of information and resources. In addition, it instills a sense of responsibility in each of the students.

“We believe that a student who embraces culture is best prepared for future success. While our world grows more interconnected, the job market of the future has yet to be defined. But we know that it will require greater understanding of people and economies outside our borders,” said Mary Shaffner. The school is planning on expanding over the next five years to bring that vision of education to even more students and more families.

The D.C. International Public Charter School has truly mastered the way to propel students to their greatest potential, and it is amazing to see the future that lies ahead of DCI students.

Emily Kelleher and Hayley Nicholas, CER Interns

Nevada leaps forward nationally with education savings accounts

by Glenn Cook
Las Vegas Review-Journal
June 7, 2015

Nevada as a trailblazer in education? Underachieving, Third-World Nevada setting a new national standard in school policy that other states are destined to follow?

Believe it. And it never, ever would have happened if a Republican Legislature and governor weren’t in power.

The sweeping education reform agenda passed by Nevada lawmakers and signed by Gov. Brian Sandoval included a groundbreaking school choice provision: nearly universal education savings accounts, or ESAs. Starting next year, parents will be able to withdraw their children from public school, gain control of the tax revenue that funded their enrollment, and spend that money on an educational program that’s best suited for them. ESAs are much better and more flexible than school vouchers for two reasons.

“First, the ESAs move from school choice to educational choice. Not all learning takes place in a classroom. By changing the education funding mechanism to reflect that reality, Nevada will allow parents to better tailor their children’s education to meet their unique learning needs,” said Jason Bedrick, policy analyst for the Cato Institute’s Center for Educational Freedom.

“Second, whereas the entire amount of the voucher had to be spent in one place at one time, the ESA funds can be spent on multiple educational products and services, and families can save unspent funds for the future. … Overnight, Nevada has become the most interesting state for education reform.”

ESAs exist in Arizona, Florida, Tennessee and Mississippi, but they place restrictions on eligibility. Across the country, parents only gain the power of choice based on their income or whether their child’s school performs poorly. Nevada’s ESA law only requires that students first be enrolled in public school to take advantage.

“By not setting conditions on the types of families able to take advantage of this program, Nevada leaders are recognizing that all parents deserve fundamental power over their children’s education, regardless of their zip code or life circumstances,” said Center for Education Reform President Kara Kerwin.

How big a deal are Nevada’s ESAs? Just read the reaction of Lily Eskelsen García, president of the National Education Association, the union for more than 3 million teachers. “I am terrified that there are more and more state legislators and state governors who have bought into this very dangerous idea that school is a commodity,” she told The Washington Post. “It’s not profitable for very good private schools to allow in children who are disabled, kids who don’t speak English, kids whose parents are struggling to put food on the table.”

Oh, please. ESAs will trigger private-sector investment in education and the creation of highly specialized private schools. As more parents take advantage of ESAs, more private schools will open to meet demand. And Bedrick points out that because parents have an incentive to save their ESA dollars, schools will have to keep tuition costs down. What a concept: competition.

“The Nobel economist Milton Friedman, the father of school choice, believed that with such far-reaching school choice, public schools would be forced to compete to retain their customers — parents and students. Studies are showing benefit to public school students with just limited school choice programs in other states. Imagine how much change will come if any child can leave for another educational setting,” said Robert Enlow, president and CEO of the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice.

“Going forward, the focus will be on matching children to schools based on their unique needs, not their address.

“We hope the rest of the nation is taking notes. We are about to see how children flourish when monopolies disappear. This is what educational freedom is all about.”

The bill’s chief sponsor was Sen. Scott Hammond, R-Las Vegas, a longtime Clark County School District teacher who is taking a job with a charter school. If Democrats controlled even one chamber of the Legislature, ESAs would not have passed. There is no bargain Democrats would have accepted, no policy trade-off, that would have compelled them to support such broad school choice — not even a doubling of taxes.

Anyone who thinks Sandoval’s national political prospects were ruined by his support of record tax increases is about to be proved wrong. Sandoval is now a school choice superstar. And so is Nevada.

Education’s Impact on Success

Education is an essential part of life. It can create an opportunity of a lifetime that many aren’t fortunate enough to obtain. Education is the key to success that opens the door to knowledge, opportunities, and personal development.

My mother strongly valued education when I was younger. It was unacceptable to bring home any grade less than a B, even though she wanted me to strive for all A’s. She knew from the start that we had full potential. I started in a public school. The classes weren’t very difficult. I easily excelled in math, reading, social studies, and science. Elementary school was a breeze. But then …middle school happened. I made a transition from a public school to a charter school. The classes became more rigorous. In the 7th grade I got my first C ever. I knew this was unacceptable. I had to try harder. What I failed to realize was that it would become more difficult. In 10th grade I got my first F, but it wasn’t long until that F went away. More rigorous courses allow me to unlock my full potential.

I noticed that during the transition of schools there were many differences: different school hours, different classes, different grading policy, but most importantly, a different feel towards education. I wasn’t sure how it would impact my learning experience in the future but so far so good.

Just like my mom pushed me to get good grades, made me take more rigorous courses, made me strive for what’s best, I strongly believe that students everywhere should have the opportunity to these challenging diverse schools. The internship at The Center of Education Reform would be the perfect place to start. I’m going to look forward to these few weeks.

Tre’Von York, CER Intern